~ / comparisons

AI Coding Agent Comparisons

Side-by-side decision pages for the agent choices developers actually make.

Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor

Compare the three workflows by memory loss, data loss, code chaos, and cost burn.

failure modes

Claude Code vs Cursor

Terminal depth vs IDE-native speed

compare

Claude Code vs ChatGPT Codex

Anthropic terminal speed vs ChatGPT Codex workflow structure

long-tail compare

ChatGPT Codex vs Cursor

ChatGPT Codex workflow vs IDE-native steering

compare

Cursor vs Windsurf

Two AI-native IDEs

compare

OpenCode vs Aider

Provider-flexible vs git-native

compare

Cline vs Continue

MCP workflow vs context providers

compare

Copilot vs Cursor

GitHub integration vs AI-native IDE

compare

Top agents to compare

Start with the current architecture leaders.

#AgentScoreTypePriceBest fit
1Claude Code86CLI/Desktop$20/$200deep terminal workflows and complex multi-step refactors
2ChatGPT Codex84CLI/Desktop$20/$200ChatGPT Codex workflows, terminal automation, and CI-style editing
3Cursor71IDE$20/mo+daily IDE coding with autocomplete and composer workflows
4Devin61Cloud$500/molong-running autonomous cloud tasks
5ClineOS61ExtensionFree agentMCP-heavy VS Code workflows and bring-your-own-model setups
6AiderOS60CLIFree agentgit-native terminal editing and experienced open-source users
7Windsurf59IDE$15/mo+AI-native IDE workflows with Cascade-style multi-file edits
8ContinueOS59ExtensionFree agentcustom context providers across VS Code and JetBrains
9OpenCodeOS53CLIFree agentprovider-flexible terminal coding with open-source control
10Copilot52IDE$10/mo+GitHub-centered teams and IDE-native suggestions